Listening > Talking

The value of a conversation is often greater for the person listening, because listening allows you to learn something new, whereas talking only gives you an opportunity to regurgitate the things you already know.

The trouble is that talking about ourselves and the things we enjoy makes us happy, which makes us crave the need to talk, and talk, and talk. Another way of looking at this is that by giving others the opportunity to talk about themselves we make them happy, whilst giving ourselves an opportunity to learn new information.

When we make someone happy, they often give us a smile. Smiling is highly contagious and releases the same amount of stimulating hormones in our bodies as picking up a wad of £20,000 according to research by Ron Gutman. What I’m saying is that if you make the person you’re with happy, you both get a huge boost of feel-good hormones.

This isn’t just the case in the real world.

Just like in real life, the benefit of entering the social web and participating in conversations as a brand or individual is as much about listening to what’s being said as it is about talking.

Let me demonstrate with a few examples…
My favourite time of the year is approaching (Christmas), and naturally, lots of brands are trying to talk about their Christmas products on the social web in the hope that people will buy from them.

But who’s listening to the tweets that tell us that people are happy to pay 4x as much money for handmade Christmas cards? Which brands are monitoring the hashtag #primaryschoolmemories which is currently trending and largely talking about Christmas cards? Which brands have social web trend monitoring in place to tell them that Christmas cards peak in number of searches on December 3rd-6th every year, but are a dying trend online, despite still being popular in Austrailia and South Africa?

I don’t think there are too many brands doing this. A few searches on the social web back me up.

Surely, it’s almost undisputable to say that for a company who sells Christmas cards, an hours worth of listening on the social web and creating actionable research around that product or market is more insightful and valuable than an hours worth of scheduling promotional tweets.
To sum this up, whether you’re a brand or an individual, online or offline, listening is more valuable to you than talking. Sure, it’s harder to measure and you’re going to have to action the insights you find, but that’s an opportunity to innovate and advance.

Posted in Uncategorized

Who Should Represent Your Brand on the Social Web?

This post originally appeared on State of Search

Given that engaging on the social web can benefit your brand’s marketing, recruitment, PR, sales, customer service, and other departments, the question of ‘who should manage and represent your brand on the social web?’ will inevitably arise. The answer is, all of them.

I believe that all employees with a passion and interest in representing the brand should be encouraged to. Utilising the expertise and networks of the people within your business is incredibly valuable when it comes to engaging on the social web and is not something that can be easily outsourced.

See more ›

Posted in Uncategorized

What Motivates People to ‘Plus one’?

Today I’ve been trying to find out what motivates people to hit the plus one button, and based on several conversations I’ve had with plus-one’rs I’ve concluded that there are four primary motivations behind why people ‘plus one’ content:

  • To share & recommend information with their followers on Google Plus and Google search
  • To bookmark content for future reference
  • To have their name & face pop up next to content (personal branding)
  • To increase sales and traffic through increasing rankings, click through rates and conversion rates.

The latter motivation only really concerns people who ‘plus one’ their own content, so if we were to ask ‘what motivates people to plus one other people’s content’ there are only three key motivations – to share and recommend, to increase personal branding or to bookmark.

That said, my gut feeling is that the majority of ‘plus ones’ outside of the Google Plus network are driven by people with a vested interest in promoting their own content – I cannot prove it, but I did run a poll that suggested that trend might be true (although based on a small sample size).

It could be said that if you don’t use G+ as a bookmarking tool or to share content with your followers, your +1s are probably a form of self-promotion. I’d be interested in hearing any counter arguments against that statement in the comments.

For me personally, I prefer to use automated services like Trunk.ly to aggregate and bookmark the content I like, and I don’t have a particularly engaged audience on Google+, so the benefits for me +1ing a page are very minimal, other than marketing benefits and helping people within my circles find great content when they search, of course.

Can any web page get naturally +1’d?

Ask yourself, what might influence someone to ‘plus one’ a page like this or the one below?

This type of page does not lend itself naturally to being shared, therefore the most likely motivation for someone who does not have a vested interest in increasing the page’s visibility online is to bookmark it for future reference.

Highly searched-for useful services also attract +1’s. In this case, the benefits tend to be either for personal branding reasons or to help people in your circles find better content when they search for related services in the future.

If there’s anything I’ve missed or if you can think of other reasons why people plus one content, I’d love to know!

A big thanks to Mike Essex, Pritesh Patel, James Carson for sharing ideas!

Posted in social media

Everything I Know About Effective Blogger Outreach

Early this week I wrote a blog post on the SEOptimise blog giving away everything I know about effective blogger outreach. For those of you who missed it, here’s a summary and link to the full post.

Image Credit: ekai

What I Learnt About Blogger Outreach From Marketing Get Noticed

A 5 second meeting in person is worth 100s of e-mails

When contacting high-profile bloggers, a five second in-person introduction has an incredible impact on increasing the likelihood of that blogger helping you out. Busy people tend to use ‘filters’ to manage their time efficiently, and one of the major filters that busy people use is ‘have I met this person in real life?’

I cannot emphasise enough how beneficial it is to attend blogger conferences as a means for improving your outreach campaigns. Second to this, a simple tweet telling the person that you dropped them an e-mail seems to significantly improve response rates as it suddenly presents you as a real person in their world. Being ‘real’ to someone outside of their inbox is effective for outreach.

Scalability is awesome IF combined with quality & selectiveness

It’s common sense that sending 100 e-mails is more effective than sending 10 e-mails, but there are two other parts to this equation: quality + selectiveness.

E-mailing 100 bloggers is pointless if your product or offering isn’t good enough. The key to getting a good response rate in an outreach campaign is to give the blogger an irresistible offering. I personally like to sit down with a pen and paper before writing an e-mail campaign and list every possible benefit that I can offer to the blogger, so that my e-mail naturally becomes focused around them and not what I want.

Also, being selective can be very beneficial. Rather than e-mailing 100 Average Joe blogs, could you use the time spent contacting them to get featured on five or six major blogs that would then influence 500 bloggers to write about your product? If your product or offering is awesome, you should be able to get featured by high-profile bloggers.

Picking up the phone is the most effective way to get what you want

A pretty simple concept that I’ve talked about before; a phone call can sometimes take a little bit longer than an e-mail, but it gives you the ability to adapt to the blogger’s immediate response, which is not something you are able to do over e-mail.

If a blogger doesn’t have a phone number listed, I’d recommend dropping them a tweet asking if it’s okay to get in touch by phone with them.

Busy people are better at time management

I remember reading an interesting concept in the book Predictably Irrational, which suggests that busier people tend to be better at responding to e-mails. The theory behind this is that busy people tend to be better at time management and actioning opportunities.

When contacting people for pre-publication reviews of Get Noticed I was shocked to see the first replies come in from CEOs of major corporations and various New York Times Best-Selling Authors.

Don’t be afraid to contact the A-list bloggers just because they’re ‘out of reach’, you’d be surprised at how accessible they are.

What I Learnt About Blogger Outreach From Writing Get Noticed

Be in the right place at the right time, all the time

One of my favourite chapters in Get Noticed is ‘How to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time, All The Time’. Most of us assume that when we we’re supposedly in the right place at the right time, it was a stroke of luck. There is in fact more science and probability at work than we might immediately recognise. Lets break it down:

  • You were prepared either subconsciously or consciously with specific and clear objectives about the type of person you wanted to meet.
  • You were both in the same place (either geographically, or virtually)
  • You were perceptive enough to make the connection with them.

The first step to being in the right place at the right time, is knowing exactly what that place is. Who are the people you are trying to meet and where do they spend their time? If the answer is tech bloggers, then analyse where tech bloggers spend their time and be there. Attend technology conferences and meet-ups, write for the blogs they read, spend time in the cities notorious for tech blogging.

Being in that place ‘all the time’ requires you to analyse how your time is spent and replacing the ‘unsociable’ hours with sociable hours. I met a lot of great people by being ‘in the right place at the right time’ whilst writing Get Noticed by writing the book in cafés and restaurants (a sociable venue) rather than in a home study or office (an unsociable venue).

Broadly speaking, there are three main categories for how we spend our time: at work, at home, at hobbies. Working out how you distribute your time in each category and finding ways to make each aspect more ‘sociable’ can increase your odds of meeting more of the people who will help you.

Understand and be sensitive to a blogger’s accessibility

Just like celebrities, bloggers are both accessible and inaccessible in different places. Understand where it is that bloggers are most accessible and use that channel to cut through the competition and get their attention.

My experience has shown me that e-mail is relatively ineffective when contacting high-profile bloggers, when compared to Twitter and attending conferences, which are both channels where bloggers tend to be far more receptive.

Some bloggers will openly state on their blogs how they like to be contacted, some will consciously or subconsciously design their site in a way that pushes you towards their preferred channel of communication (i.e. if they have their Twitter link or phone number at the bottom of every post and only a fairly hidden link to their e-mail on one page, you’re probably best contacting them via Twitter or telephone!)

Utilise your existing network

When you do things for altruistic reasons it makes you feel genuinely good about yourself, especially if you’ve helped out a friend. Utilising your existing network is a powerful way to reach bloggers if your current network is likely to know the sort of people you need to meet. Those of you who follow me on Twitter will know that I ask for a lot of virtual introductions to new people who are relevant to what I’m doing. This works amazingly well, as I always link to those who help me out as well as those who I virtually meet in the blog posts that I write.

If you need to meet sport bloggers, send a few e-mails to your friends or send out a tweet to see if anyone can help you out – don’t feel like you’re burdening your network, you’re not, in fact you’re helping them, too.

Be likeable, genuine, and understand a blogger’s motivations

I receive a fair number of outreach e-mails to my personal website e-mail accounts, and the #1 reason why I don’t reply to some of them is because they’ve forgotten to mention or outline what the benefit is to me.

Why should I waste half an hour helping someone I’ve never met increase their rankings and profile by blogging about them? There are plenty of reasons, such as: it gives me extra content, I could receive affiliate commissions, a free product to test, promotion from their company’s social media accounts or an invite to an exclusive webinar, but they rarely mention my motivations.

Also, remember that only 7% of communication between humans is ‘what you say’, 93% of what you say is non-verbal communication, which means that if you’re e-mailing someone, 93% of your communication is lost in translation as the recipient cannot see your body language, facial expression, and to some extent, tone.

This means that you need to make ‘what you say’ compensate for the lack of non-verbal communication by ensuring that your tone is likeable and that the core message to your e-mail is genuine and honest.

Posted in social media

Warning! The Social Web May Harm Your Physical & Mental Well-Being

I’m halfway through reading Engage! by Brian Solis and just came across a really great quote from John Freeman that was posted in the Wall Street Journal about the impacts that consuming new media in real-time is having on our well-being and information digesting habits.

In the past two decades, we have witnessed one of the greatest breakdowns of the barrier between our work and personal lives since the notion of leisure time emerged in Victorian Britain as a result of the Industrial Age. It has put us under great physical and mental strain, altering our brain chemistry and daily needs. It has isolated us from the people with whom we live, siphoning us away from real-world places where we gather. It has encouraged flotillas of unnecessary jabbering, making it difficult to tell signal from noise. It has made it more difficult to read slowly and enjoy it, hastening the already declining rates of literacy. It has made it harder to listen and mean it, to be idle and not fidget. This is not a sustainable way to live. This lifestyle of being constantly on causes emotional and physical burnout, workplace meltdowns, and unhappiness.

I like what John is saying and agree that the overlap in personal and work life is becoming increasingly blurred, but I do not entirely believe the claims to the social web increasing the rate of illiteracy. I think the access to a larger variety of immediate news & information has made us better equipped to find and digest higher quality information throughout the day that in the long run benefits our learning. Of course, due to the nature of having to scour through fast-paced activity feeds, it has impacted how we read ‘real time news’, but I don’t think those short-term bursts of skim reading have any long-term impact on our ability to sit down and enjoy reading a long novel, slowly.

Here’s another great quote on how the social web is impacting attention spans is this one from Linda Stone, who suggests that the social web is causing more instances of Continuous Partial Attention.

Continuous partial attention describes how many of us use our attention today. It is different from multi-tasking. The two are differentiated by the impulse that motivates them. When we multitask, we are motivated by a desire to be more productive and more efficient. We’re often doing things that are automatic, that require very little cognitive processing. We give the same priority to much of what we do when we multi-task—we file and copy papers, talk on the phone, eat lunch—we get as many things done at one time as we possibly can in order to make more time for ourselves and in order to be more efficient and more productive.

To pay continuous partial attention is to pay partial attention—CONTINUOUSLY. It is motivated by a desire to be a LIVE node on the network. Another way of saying this is that we want to connect and be connected. We want to effectively scan for opportunity and optimize for the best opportunities, activities, and contacts, in any given moment. To be busy, to be connected, is to be alive, to be recognized, and to matter. We pay continuous partial attention in an effort NOT TO MISS ANYTHING. It is an always-on, anywhere, anytime, any place behavior that involves an artificial sense of constant crisis. We are always in high alert when we pay continuous partial attention. This artificial sense of constant crisis is more typical of continuous partial attention than it is of multi-tasking

Your thoughts?

Posted in social media

How to Get Links & Features in News Publications The Easy Way

Getting yourself featured in The New York Times, The Guardian, and industry publications is a PR, social and SEO dream. If you want to be featured in these articles you have to provide something newsworthy (emphasis on provide i.e. not necessarily ‘create’).

Lets cut to the chase – hundreds of thousands of articles are written by journalists for publications every day, and those journalists are out there looking for people to contribute to their articles. Based on the concepts from Get Noticed about ‘being in the right place at the right time, all the time’ I’ve learnt some cool ways to get the attention of journalists when and where they’re most accessible.

In this blog post I’d like to share a few of the techniques I use to find relevant opportunities to get news features.

Tip 1) HelpaReporterOut.com

HARO is an incredible concept that started out as a private Facebook group. Quite simply, journalists post queries when they’re looking for public input and then people like you and I can ‘pitch’ our feedback to these journalists to help them complete their article.
However, the real gold in HARO lies in their newsletter. The website is great, but the newsletter is greater – every morning I receive a list of the latest journalist queries sectioned by industry that I can then pitch for.

Here is an example of what their newsletter looks like:


When you click on one of the links in the newsletter it shows you the journalists contact details, what the article brief is, whether they provide a link, and their writing deadline.
The trick is knowing when they send out their newsletter so that you don’t miss the boat. HARO usually send out their newsletters at 10.42am and 10.42pm so it pays to be on your e-mail at these times to be able to respond quickly.

Tip 2) Monitoring Twitter Hashtags – #journorequest, #haro, #prrequest

Twitter is an invaluable tool for journalists and bloggers to carry out research for articles. Most journalists use the hashtags #journorequest, #haro, or #prrequest when looking for people to submit their thoughts. Below is a screenshot of some of the opportunities on the #journorequest hashtag.

However, since copying and pasting the above screenshot there have been another 20 tweets posted on it, so you’re going to need to filter what’s relevant and what’s not. I recommend creating an RSS feed of a Twitter search for ‘#journorequest AND your keywords OR #haro AND your keywords etc’ to pull out only journalist requests that are relevant to you.

Tip 3) Find journalists by Using Clever Google Search Queries

Not all journalists are going to be using Twitter, and if you’re looking to scale up your efforts and get featured in not only news publications, but on blogs that are looking for input you’re probably going to want to use Google to scan Q&A sites, forums, and blog posts for journo requests.
Here are a few Google search queries that can help:



I would advise searching for these queries with ‘past 24 hours’ or ‘past week’ selected to filter only recent results.

Tip 4) Lanyrd.com

Lanyrd.com is a search engine of conferences that you can attend. This is a bit of an odd tip, but one that is too good to not include. If you ask yourself the over-riding question of “where do journalists or bloggers spend their time?” and split your answers by ‘online’ and ‘offline’, you would probably find that many of the high-profile editors and journos you’re trying to reach spend a large chunk of their time at conferences, and not only do they spend their time there but they’re also most accessible in those locations.

Journalists are a nightmare to get the attention of when they’re at their news desks or writing stories as quite often they have tight deadlines and mountains of work to get through, but at conferences and events it’s quite likely that you could get their undivided attention for a few minutes to find out what they’re writing about, what they’re looking for, and of course, how you can help.
I strongly recommend using Lanyrd to follow which conferences the journalists in your industry are attending and then using plain old e-mail or Twitter to arrange a meeting at the event.

Understanding Journalist’s Accessibility to Your Advantage

In Get Noticed, we came up with a concept called ‘The ACE Process’, which is a set of stages that you can apply to meet any person in the world, whether they’re a celebrity, a journalist, or just someone who would be a good friend.

The ACE Process stands for ‘align’ ‘connect’ ‘engage’. When meeting someone, you must first align with them where they’re accessible to meet you i.e. be in the same place as them (geographically or virtually) where you are both able to connect.

It’s easy to be in the same place at the same time as a journalist, especially virtually via e-mail, but these places tend not to be where they are most accessible. Learning more about the concept of spotting and creating accessible pathways to get people’s attention can be really valuable when it comes to this sort of outreach.

If anyone is interest in these concepts, we’re currently looking for advance reviewers of Get Noticed. You can sign up for your copy on WeGetNoticed.com.

Image Credit: shironekoeuro

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in social media

Takeaways From Social Media Marketing & Monitoring 2011 London (#SMM11)

Today I attended and spoke at SMM11, one of the UK’s leading social media marketing conferences. It’s been a really awesome day with lots of great people and I’ve learnt some amazing tips to take home. In this post I’m going to summarise a few of the key takeaways from my favourite talks of the day.


Note: I’m writing this from Social Media Marketing & Monitoring and am pretty exhausted! ;) Apologies for any poorly worded sentences and/or spelling mistakes! I promise to revisit this when i’m back in the zone :)

First of all, a big shout out to Luke and the team who organised SMM11 – this was without a doubt one of the best digital conferences I’ve attended to date. I’ve been to a fair few digital marketing conferences over the years such as SMX, SES, and SearchLove, and what immediately stood out about this conference was the quality and variety of information being shared. All of the speakers I listened to had a really interesting and varied area of expertise – from gamification, to location marketing, and even expertise in defeating Simon Cowell – always good to know!

Beyond Engagement: Delivering Sales through Social for Captain Morgan
One of my favourite talks at SMM11 was from Marcus Dyer of Edelmen Digital and Mark Wheeler, global digital marketing manager of Diageo. Marcus and Mark talked through the success of a great social media campaign they did with Captain Morgan’s spiced rum.

The campaign was called ‘The Captain’s Island‘ and was essentially rewarding Facebook fans with ‘keys’ in return for various types of engagement on Captain Morgan’s Facebook Page. Interestingly, Mark pointed out that the brand predominantly use Facebook due to the responsible marketing policies to ensure that the company are only targeting people over the legal drinking age. Facebook is one of the only major social networks that asks for your age on signup, making it more accessible for alcohol brands such as Captain Morgan to use.

The success of Captain Morgan’s campaign was largely attributed to tying it in with the real world and thinking outside of the social media platforms that hosted the campaign. Captain Morgan promoted the campaign in TV adverts, in bars across the world, and on the packaging of the bottles of rum.

The What, Why and How of Social Local Marketing
In PJ Verhoef’s talk about location marketing, he talked about how to benefit from location-based marketing (beyond the check-in and Foursquare). He displayed some cool alternative platforms for location marketing and gave some great tips on how to link products to location based marketing, whether that ‘product’ is online information, a physical product, or even your staff members. PJ also gave some excellent ideas for location people using location-based marketing, listening to them using tools such as Geotoko, Valuevine, and Momentfeed, engaging with them, and encouraging transactions using things like Google Offers and Level Up.

How I Beat Simon Cowell Using Social Media
Jon Morter gave an excellent talk on how he used social media to get Rage Against the Machine’s song Killing in the Name of to Christmas #1. What I found particularly interesting about Jon’s talk was how he used his background in hacking to explore and ‘break’ social media conventions. For example – Jon pointed out that until recently, you could become the administrator of any groups on Facebook that didn’t have already have an admin and then message all of the members of the group. Apparently Jon used this method to become the admin of around 300 Facebook groups, which he used to message the members about his campaign!

Jon emphasised that the victory against Simon Cowell was largely due to reading the fine print and knowing the rules. Jon studied the official chart rules for weeks on end to find loopholes in the system. Some of the loopholes that played a large part in Jon’s success were that live track sales also counted as a vote for that song. Jon messaged members on the last day asking members of the Facebook groups to also purchase the live version of Killing in the name of – adding an extra ~70,000 sales of the song.

The key takeaway that I learnt from Jon’s talk was the power of creating big stories using smaller outlets. Jon mentioned that he took a small radio station’s servers down when he was featured, as a way of creating a newsworthy story. When interviewed on a national radio station, Jon deliberately cut himself off saying ‘Simon Cowell is a…’ to make it seem that the radio station cut him off – therefore creating another wave of PR. Jon continued this method until he finally received a call from Simon Cowell himself – who congratulated Jon.

bmibaby Case Study: Using Photo Based Networks to Inspire Customer Loyalty & Engagement
This presentation by Rabbit Agency and BMI Baby showed how BMI Baby used Instagram to engage with a large pre existing community of snap happy BMI Baby customers. It was really great to hear a case study of a brand using a niche social network successfully, as most of case studies in social media tend to focus around the major players such as Twitter and Facebook.

BMI Baby encouraged groups of ‘Instagramers’ (communities of people on Instagram who take photos of their citiy e.g. London Instagramers) to take photos of the destinations that BMI Baby fly to. The campaign received thousands of entries within just a few weeks and allowed the brand to create ‘visual inspiration guides’ using the photos that the Instagram community were creating.

Final thoughts
SMM11 was an awesome conference, and I thoroughly recommend future events. The people, presentations, and biscuits were all excellent and overall the experience was leaps and bounds beyond the other similar conferences I’ve attended.

I also promised that I would upload my presentation from SMM11, so here we go!

If you have any questions about the presentation feel free to drop me a tweet at @MarcusATaylor or via e-mail on Marcus(at)SEOptimise(dot)com.

Posted in social media

Who Still Advertises with News of the World?

Over the past few days there has been a massive uproar on social networks around the #notw phonehacking scandals. A large number of brands including Ford, Mitsibushi, The Co-operative Group, Vauxhall, Lloyds Banking Group and Virgin Holidays have boycotted the News of the World following a Twitter campaign launched by The Z Factor to stop major advertisers funding the newspaper for its illegal phone.

It seems that there is now a relative competition going on between brands that are continuing to advertise vs. those that have pulled out. Many of the brands, especially Mitsubishi have gained some great publicity by donating their News of the World ad spend to charities. Many other brands including Tescos are however getting a lot of negative PR for how they are handling the situation (slowly..)

Anyways, here is a list of the brands who are currently still advertising with News of the World. You can send them a tweet to boycott their advertising spend here.

Butlins

Coca Cola

Comet

Gone Fair Trade

Morrisons

RBS

Renault

Tesco

Carpet Right

First Choice

Ford

T Mobile

Xtravision

Here is also a great list on the Guardian of the top 50 News of the World advertisers along with their official comments: http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jul/06/news-of-the-world-top-50-advertisers-spend

My thoughts

I am massively supportive of this campaign, and find it fascinating particularly from a social marketing perspective. It clearly shows that a negative PR campaign is a lot easier to send viral than a positive one; which has been demonstrated before with the likes of the Rage Against the X Factor campaign. However, my only concerns are that firstly, will this boycotting last? Even if 20% of The News of the World’s advertisers are lost it is only a 10% revenue drop for them. Secondly, is it really right? Ultimately, The News of the World employs a large number of ethical people who had nothing to do with the phone hacking, and by hitting their ad revenue those people’s jobs get put at risk.

Update

It appears The News of the World have claimed that this Sunday’s issue of The News of the World will be the last one ever due to the boycott and damage caused to the brand.

What an awesome case study for reputation management and the power of social media :-)

Posted in social media

Social Media vs. SEO Return on Investment (with Daniel Bianchini & Marcus Taylor)

Today, Daniel Bianchini and I thought we’d create a video blog post discussing the difference between return on investment on social media and search engine optimisation. We hope this will be the first in a long line of video blogs by SEOptimise.

We hope you enjoy it and provide us with your valuable comments below about the video and chosen topic.

Posted in social media

How social media impacts on our buying decisions and what it means for businesses

A few weeks ago I had the pleasure of doing a really fun guest talk at Oxford Brookes University on how social media has affected the contemporary consumer and where online business is heading with the growth of social media. In this post I want to share a few of the points from that talk on why social media is not just a service full of buzz words that can be strapped on to the end of an SEO campaign, but is in fact an essential element of something much, much bigger to come.

Rewind the clock ten years ago, remember when you would tell friends about products you liked or disliked only if you felt really strongly about them? Chances are only a small number of people would hear about what you thought of the products and services you’d use on a daily basis. Fast forward to today, where the context of your relationships with your ‘friends’ are based on frequent micro-updates – a whole lot more people know a whole lot more about the little things you like, or dislike, and because everyone’s doing that it impacts those product’s business.
For example, imagine that you just tried a new a new flavored cola and decided it tastes disgusting – ten years ago you’d probably do very little other than throw it in the bin and swear to never make the purchase again, nowadays that would qualify a tweet or a status update to many people – which if you were the cola manufacturer could do a whole lot of damage to your sales if people are telling thousands of people that it tastes like crap.
Similarly, if you walked into a brick-and-mortar shop, lets say Coffee House XYZ and they have a terrible service, the consequence 10 years ago is that you’d say “I’m never coming here again” and Coffee House XYZ would lose one customer, but nowadays the consequence of that bad service is Coffee House XYZ can potentially lose tens or even hundreds, maybe even thousands of customers if that experience is broadcasted via social networking websites.
In a way this is fantastic news, as the major corporations who have got away with serving sub-standard products and services for years will be the first to become dinosaurs in this social revolution, and the companies who are personable and showing their human side will raise the bar and rise to the top. There is a great interview I recommend that social marketing genius Gary Vaynerchuk recently did on MSNBC’s Morning Joe show where he suggested that our great great ancestors are better adapted to how businesses should be ran today than we are – whereby back in the day you would walk into a local convenience store and the store owner would know your name and all about you and your tastes and make recommendations personalised to you. That is exactly what the minority of social-savvy online businesses are doing right now.
Why does this approach work?
People like relationships, and are often prepared to pay a company more money if they like that company more than a competitor. Imagine if you had a few quid to spend on healthy food bars this week and you walked into your local food store to find some own brand bars for 40p each or an alternative bar that was 60p but the brand with the 60p bars had sent you a thank you message on Twitter when you last bought their bars and you knew that you could phone them up to tell them about your day if you needed to. The relationship with the brand is what a lot of people want to buy in to, and if you don’t believe that then I recommend taking a look at the success of companies like Nakd Wholefoods, Wine Library TV, and Graze.
Will Google drop the bomb on social search?
Finally, I want to bring to reality why all of this is in fact going to be a big change – the company who I and many other people within the social media industry believe are sitting behind this revolution is Google. Over the past year or two we’ve seen Google introduce personalised search, prominence of local results increasing, social signals becoming a ranking factor, real-time search, and most importantly the ‘shared by’ snippets beneath search results, all of which are steps towards what I believe will be the future search – a social search engine whereby Google will be returning results based almost entirely on your personal social graph.

Read more: http://wallblog.co.uk/2011/04/01/how-social-media-impacts-on-our-buying-decisions-and-what-it-means-for-businesses/#ixzz1JhBIn1rF

Posted in social media
Marcus is an author, speaker, & entrepreneur currently travelling the world, building projects that explore why people do what they do.

To learn more about Marcus and his projects click here.

My Book
Connect

My Reading List

Here's a list of books i've been reading lately and what I liked and disliked about them.
Recent Tweets

Recent Posts